Visit Jim Dent's column >>

JIM DENT

The Commoners Guide to the Galaxy
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 98; Links Seeded: 726
Member Since: 3/2006Last Seen: 11/06/2009

Hannity Feeds Stephanopoulos Debate Question On Weather Underground»

advertisement

Last night's ABC News Democratic presidential candidates debate was co-moderated by George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson, but the unseen influence of Fox News' Sean Hannity was also on stage.

Hannity, who for months has been aggressively pushing a story about Barack Obama's connections to a former member of a radical anti-Vietnam 1970s organization called the Weather Underground, interviewed Stephanopoulos on his radio show on Tuesday, where he pressed the ABC host to ask Obama about this

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.3
{"commentId":1705371,"authorDomain":"jimdent"}

More...

Not everyone was upset about the debate. The New York Times' David Brooks writes, "I understand the complaints, but I thought the questions were excellent." So does Hannity.
{"commentId":1705371,"threadId":"251870","contentId":"1437924","authorDomain":"jimdent"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":1706431,"authorDomain":"ronco104"}

hey jim, whats happening? i hope i am not alone in stating that the dems and the pubies, certainly the national media, and a very large portion of the voting population have reduced our election process and those things that are important and relevant, to 'gotcha' politics. how sad, not to mention downright destructive all this is. i am so sick of this kinda crap. if the media can't ask relevant questions about relevant issues, they should fold their collective tents and release their strangle hold on coverage of all things political. there has to be someone, some thing that can step in and do the job of reporting, and especially bringing back relevancy too the covering of political events like debates. ask tough questions, hell yea. but let it be about the real issues that go unnoticed, or ignored in the need to create sensationalism by digging up bull@!$%#.
peple will have to decide if they want bull@!$%# or truth. if truth wins out, people can let the national news organization know that the people have had a gut full by boycotting everything that is national media. i have had a one-man boycott on the major tv networks dating back to the early eighties. it can be done!!!!!

luv,

ron

{"commentId":1706431,"threadId":"251870","contentId":"1437924","authorDomain":"ronco104"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:38 AM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"251870","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"251870","contentId":"1437924"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking